PUBLIC RECORDVerifiedcourt filing

JPMorgan Chase Epstein Settlement ($365 Million, June 2023)

Combined $365 million settlement by JPMorgan Chase resolving the USVI Attorney General enforcement action ($75M) and victims' class action ($290M) related to the bank's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein from 1998-2013.

U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Justice / U.S. District Court

Overview

In June 2023, JPMorgan Chase agreed to pay a combined $365 million to resolve two separate legal actions related to its banking relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The bank maintained Epstein as a client from approximately 1998 to 2013 — five years after his 2008 conviction on state sex offenses in Florida.

The Settlements

USVI Attorney General Settlement — $75 Million

The U.S. Virgin Islands Attorney General's enforcement action against JPMorgan alleged that the bank:

  • Maintained Epstein as a client despite knowledge of his criminal history
  • Processed transactions that facilitated Epstein's operations in the U.S. Virgin Islands
  • Failed to file adequate Suspicious Activity Reports on Epstein's accounts
  • Allowed Epstein to refer wealthy clients to the bank, creating financial incentives to retain the relationship

Victims' Class Action Settlement — $290 Million

A class action lawsuit brought on behalf of Epstein's victims resulted in a $290 million settlement. The suit alleged that:

  • JPMorgan's banking services enabled Epstein's criminal enterprise
  • The bank profited from the relationship while ignoring red flags
  • Victims suffered harm that was facilitated by the bank's failure to act
  • Internal communications showed bank employees were aware of concerns

Key Findings from Litigation

The Jes Staley Connection

Court documents revealed that JPMorgan executive Jes Staley, who led the bank's private banking division, maintained a personal relationship with Epstein:

  • Staley visited Epstein on multiple occasions, including at his private island
  • The personal relationship influenced the bank's decision to retain Epstein as a client
  • Staley left JPMorgan in 2013, the same year the bank dropped Epstein
  • JPMorgan separately sued Staley, who settled for approximately $80 million

Compliance Failures

The litigation established that:

  • JPMorgan's compliance department flagged Epstein's accounts on multiple occasions
  • Relationship managers overrode compliance recommendations
  • The bank's anti-money laundering (AML) systems were insufficient to prevent the processing of suspicious transactions
  • The bank continued servicing Epstein's accounts despite internal red flags

Significance

The JPMorgan settlement was the largest financial recovery in the Epstein case at the time of resolution. It established that:

  1. Financial institutions can be held liable for maintaining relationships with convicted offenders
  2. Compliance failures that enable criminal activity carry substantial financial consequences
  3. The personal relationships between bank executives and clients can compromise institutional safeguards
  4. Victims have standing to pursue claims against institutions that facilitated their abuse

Sources and Further Reading